Research and insights from our team at EpiDriver. Our publications include scientific articles, reports, and educational materials.
Highlights from key studies, articles, and resources that inspire and complement EpiDriver’s mission.
Our topics are related to public health, healthcare access, behavior change, and environmental health indicators.
These topics are relevant for understanding and addressing health inequalities, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, and health promotion. We emphasizes the importance of people-centered care and decision-making processes in healthcare.
Our content provides valuable insights into the complex interactions between people, their environments, and health outcomes. Furthermore, it can further elaborate on these theories or models for a more comprehensive understanding.
is a broad and complex theory with the purpose of describing and explaining causal relationships in disease distribution. While it incorporates biological and psychosocial influences on disease occurrence, the theory is also suited to analyze the relationships between social factors and disease development in public health research. The core constructs of Ecosocial Theory are: Embodiment; Pathways to Embodiment; the cumulative interplay between exposure, resistance, and susceptibility; and agency and accountability. Further, the theory specifies that all constructs must be considered in concert, as they work together in a synergistic explanation of disease distribution. The theory assumes that distributions of disease are determined at multiple levels and that analyses must incorporate historical, political economic, temporal, and spatial analyses.
(This graphic is adapted to the colors and designs of the brand)
Nancy Krieger, Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective, International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 30, Issue 4, August 2001, Pages 668–677, https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.4.668
“…the interaction between, and interdependence of, factors within and across all levels of a health problem. It highlights people’s interactions with their physical and sociocultural environments.”
Ecological models recognize multiple levels of influence on health behaviors, including:
(This graphic is adapted to the colors and designs of the brand)
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351-77.
The Health Belief Model predicts that a specific health behavior is more or less likely based on an individual’s perceptions of disease severity and personal susceptibility to the disease combined with perceived benefits and barriers to that behavior. For an individual to adopt a specific behavior, the perception of the threat of disease and the benefits of the health behavior must outweigh the perceived barriers. Personal factors, sense of self-efficacy, and cues to action are also frequently included in the model. The Health Belief Model is most applicable to behavior change interventions for patients.
(This graphic is adapted to the colors and designs of the brand)
Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175–183.
The TTM posits that individuals move through six stages of change: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, and termination. Termination was not part of the original model and is less often used in application of stages of change for health-related behaviors. For each stage of change, different intervention strategies are most effective at moving the person to the next stage of change and subsequently through the model to maintenance, the ideal stage of behavior.
(This graphic is adapted to the colors and designs of the brand)
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
(SCT) describes the influence of individual experiences, the actions of others, and environmental factors on individual health behaviors. SCT provides opportunities for social support through instilling expectations, self-efficacy, and using observational learning and other reinforcements to achieve behavior change.
Key components of the SCT related to individual behavior change include:
(This graphic is adapted to the colors and designs of the brand)
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
The idea behind is that an integrated approach to risk management and population health can combines the “key elements of both fields can provide a more comprehensive and more powerful approach to addressing critical health issues” (Krewski et al., 2007). Among the key population, “health elements are the prominence of the determinants of health and the inclusion of a wide range of risk management interventions, including interventions based on community action” (Krewski et al., 2007). In this sense, “health risk science corresponds to the risk assessment component of the traditional risk frameworks, with health risk policy analysis reflecting the risk management component” (Krewski et al., 2007). As can be seen, the integrated framework is built on three categories of health determinants: “biological and genetic determinants (such as genetic endowment, the functioning of various body systems, and the processes of development and aging); environmental and occupational determinants (including the physical environment, both natural and human-built, and employment and working conditions); and social and behavioral determinants (such as income and social status, social support networks, education, personal health practices and coping skill, gendered norms, and culture) and their interactions” (Krewski et al., 2007).
(This graphic is adapted to the colors and designs of the brand)
Krewski, D., Hogan, V., Turner, M. C., Zeman, P. L., McDowell, I., Edwards, N. & Losos, J. (2007). An Integrated Framework for Risk Management and Population Health. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 13(6), 1288–1312.
An alternative to the DPSIR Framework is the Driving force-Pressure-State-Exposure-Effect-Action (DPSEEA) Framework. DPSEEA has been widely used in European and international health assessments (Corvalan et al., 1999).
However, by emphasizing the link between environmental degradation and human health, DPSEEA de-emphasized elements of the DPSIR framework, such as natural capital provided by ecosystems (Impact) that is a core concept of sustainability.
(This graphic is adapted to the colors and designs of the brand)
Carneiro FF, Oliveira ML, Netto GF, Galvão LA, Cancio JA, Bonini EM, Corvalan CF. Meeting report: development of environmental health indicators in Brazil and other countries in the americas. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Sep;114(9):1407-8.
ETR’s Health Equity Framework is a model that describes the ways that health and education outcomes are influenced by complex interactions between people and their environments.
The Health Equity Framework is ETR’s shared language for talking about health and education equity. The Framework is also a reflection tool to assess approaches to health equity and explore new pathways for learning.
Peterson A, Charles V, Yeung D, Coyle K. The Health Equity Framework: A Science- and Justice-Based Model for Public Health Researchers and Practitioners. Health Promotion Practice. 2021;22(6):741-746.
Primary care is a model of care that supports first-contact, accessible, continuous, comprehensive and coordinated person-focused care. It aims to optimize population health and reduce disparities across the population by ensuring that subgroups have equal access to services. There are five core functions of primary care:
Macinko J, Montenegro H, Nebot Adell C, Etienne C; Grupo de Trabajo de Atención Primaria de Salud de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud. La renovación de la atención primaria de salud en las Américas [Renewing primary health care in the Americas]. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Feb-Mar;21(2-3):73-84. Spanish.
Two closely associated theories — The Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior — suggest that a person’s health behavior is determined by their intention to perform a behavior. A person’s intention to perform a behavior (behavioral intention) is predicted by 1) a person’s attitude toward the behavior, and 2) subjective norms regarding the behavior. Subjective norms are the result of social and environmental surroundings and a person’s perceived control over the behavior. Generally, positive attitude and positive subjective norms result in greater perceived control and increase the likelihood of intentions governing changes in behavior.
(This graphic is adapted to the colors and designs of the brand)
Source: Hackman CL, Knowlden AP. Theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior-based dietary interventions in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014 Jun 6;5:101-14.
EpiDriver ©2025 / All rights reserved.